Week 2 Research Proposal Literature Review (Rough Draft) Literature Review Rough Draft The literature review is one of the most important

Week 2 Research Proposal Literature Review (Rough Draft)

Literature Review Rough Draft

The literature review is one of the most important components, and often the most time consuming part, of a good research proposal. Without the solid foundation of a good literature review, it is difficult to make a strong research proposal.

This week, you will work to develop a rough draft of your literature review. You will continue to develop the literature review next week based on feedback provided by your instructor. Then in week 7, you will submit a well-polished literature review as part of your final research proposal.

The following requirements should be met in your literature review:

· Include a minimum of six scholarly sources

· Organize in logical sections

· Include an overview of the literature

· Be unbiased in your presentation of information

· Include sources and content relevant to your research questions and hypothesis; state the relevance in your literature review

· Include a critical assessment of the sources. Do not simply include a summary of what you have read

· A strong introduction and conclusion, including further questions for research

· Proper APA formatting, citations, and references

Keep in mind that this is a rough draft, so the literature review does not need to be perfect. However, you should still submit a literature review with proper APA formatting, correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar that meets all of the specifications of the assignment listed above. You will then receive feedback from your instructor and continue to do more research, and modify and improve your current literature review.

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 100

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review Rough Draft Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review Rough Draft Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

10 to >8.2 pts

Accomplished

A minimum of 6 scholarly sources are included and are appropriate for the topic at hand

8.2 to >7.5 pts

Emerging

A minimum of 4 scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

7.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0+ scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion

15 to >12.3 pts

Accomplished

A strong introduction and conclusion are included that appropriately introduce the topic and conclude the literature review.

12.3 to >11.25 pts

Emerging

An introduction and conclusion are included that somewhat introduce the topic and somewhat conclude the literature review.

11.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An introduction and conclusion may be absent or highly inappropriate.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review

65 to >53.3 pts

Accomplished

A comprehensive analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A complete, detailed review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A clear and thorough assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is clearly identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are well identified.

53.3 to >48.75 pts

Emerging

A vague or incomplete analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A general review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A general assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is somewhat identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are somewhat identified.

48.75 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Literature review is missing or incomplete. The review does not provide enough information to attach to a problem statement.

65 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

10 to >8.2 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

8.2 to >7.5 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

7.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

10 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Reflections should be approximately 500 words and scholarly, using APA 7 formatting for citations.*  Please reflect upon your simulation experience addressing

Reflections should be approximately 500 words and scholarly, using APA 7 formatting for citations.*  Please reflect upon your simulation experience addressing all of the following:  · What overall thoughts do you have about your simulation experience?  -great opportunity to practice patient interactions. New experience working with pediatric patients Patient was

NURS-6003N ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2: STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Nurse-scholars have a

NURS-6003N ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2: STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and

NURS 3620 Health History Rubric Criteria

NURS 3620 Health History Rubric Criteria Possible Points Points Obtained Feedback Selects client from appropriate clinical setting 5 Identifies key health issues 10 Identifies allergies 5 Identifies potential mobility issues 10 Identifies nutritional issues or special diets 5 Identifies ability to complete activities of daily living 10 Identifies social determinants

*WCHT=Women’s Center for Healing and Transformation 2023-07-15 2023-09-03 2023-10-23 2023-12-12 2024-01-31 2024-03-21 2024-05-10 2024-06-29 2024-08-18

*WCHT=Women’s Center for Healing and Transformation 2023-07-15 2023-09-03 2023-10-23 2023-12-12 2024-01-31 2024-03-21 2024-05-10 2024-06-29 2024-08-18 2024-10-07 2024-11-26 Approval of WCHT* of the project Implementation plan development Development of community connections IRB approval Develop and distribute marketing materials Hold community meeting to plan details Coordinate with WCHT* to lead group walks